We make it easy to hire people online. Get a money-back guarantee, awesome workspace, clear terms in plain English, upfront bills with itemized PDF receipts.

All purchases (except Tips) are subject to a non-refundable Handling Fee of $3.49. This pays for platform overheads including admin, hosting, marketing, data costs and 24×7×365 support.

  • Web / Mobile / Tech
  • Design / Art / Video / Audio
  • Bookings
  • Writing / Translation
  • Business / Admin
  • VPS & Cloud Hosting

Hi, I’m Jane, I’m here to help you do business on HostJane.

So I can provide you the best support, choose a topic:

I also have information about your privacy if required.

Ask Jane for help Ask
HostJane seller Hyprtxt - JavaScript ES6

Taylor

JavaScript ES6

Apps / Mobile

Robust, secure iOS and Android mobile app development in Swift and/or Kotlin; mobile web; .NET, JAVA or NodeJS; iOS (SwiftUI) and/or Android (Jetpack Compose). Find Apps / Mobile WFH freelancers on January 21, 2025 who work remotely. Read less

Read more
Board & chat Inside your order

ADVERTISEMENT

Managed VPS Hosting

$22.95/mo

Keep exploring
Top Frequently Asked Questions
What is Google Flutter used for?


Google Flutter is an open-source UI software development kit created by Google for building natively compiled applications for mobile, web, and desktop from a single codebase. Here's how it works, what it does, and some use examples:

What Does Google Flutter Do?

Unified Development: Flutter allows developers to build user interfaces for multiple platforms using one codebase, primarily written in Dart.

High Performance: It compiles to native code, which means apps can perform at or near native speed on supported platforms.

Rich UI: Flutter provides a rich set of customizable widgets that help in creating beautiful, responsive UIs.

Hot Reload: Offers a hot reload feature for faster development cycles, allowing developers to see changes almost instantly without restarting the app.

How Does Google Flutter Work?

Dart Programming Language:
Flutter uses Dart, an object-oriented language developed by Google. Dart is compiled to native code for mobile apps, to JavaScript for web applications, and to desktop executables.

Widget-Based Architecture:
Everything in Flutter is a widget, from the app itself to the smallest UI elements. Widgets are used to describe the UI layout and can be combined to build complex interfaces.

Rendering Engine:
Skia: Flutter uses Skia, a 2D graphics library, for rendering. This allows for high-quality graphics that are consistent across platforms.

Flutter Engine: The core of Flutter, this C++ engine handles the rendering, animation, and input across all platforms.

Compilation:
Ahead-of-Time (AOT) Compilation: For production builds, Dart code is compiled to native machine code, enhancing performance.

Just-In-Time (JIT) Compilation: During development, JIT compilation is used to support hot reload functionality.

Platform Integration:
Flutter apps interact with native platform components through platform channels if necessary, allowing access to device features like cameras, sensors, etc.

How Flutter Works in Practice:

Development Cycle:
Developers write code in Dart, using Flutter's widgets to construct the UI.
They can use hot reload to see changes in real-time.
When ready, the app is compiled into native code for deployment.

UI Composition:
Flutter uses a declarative UI approach. Developers describe what the UI should look like at any given state, and Flutter takes care of rendering it.

State Management:
Flutter provides several ways to manage app state, including the Provider package, BLoC (Business Logic Component) pattern, or even simpler state management with StatefulWidgets.

Use Examples:

Mobile Applications:
Example: The official Google Ads app was rebuilt using Flutter for both Android and iOS, providing a consistent, high-performance experience across platforms.

How it Works: Developers write a single Dart code that's deployed to both platforms, with platform-specific optimizations handled by Flutter's engine.

Web Applications:
Example: Alibaba's Xianyu (闲鱼), a second-hand goods marketplace, uses Flutter for its web version to maintain consistency with its mobile app.

How it Works: The same codebase can be used to render a responsive web UI, with HTML/CSS automatically generated from Flutter's widgets.

Desktop Applications:
Example: Google's own "Super Editor" is developed using Flutter for desktop, showcasing rich text editing capabilities.

How it Works: Flutter for desktop compiles Dart to native code for Windows, macOS, or Linux, using platform-specific rendering backends.

IoT Devices:
Example: Flutter can be used for UI on IoT devices with screens, like smart home controllers or digital signage.

How it Works: The codebase can run on embedded systems, offering a UI with the same look and feel as mobile or desktop applications.

Prototyping and MVP Development:
Example: Startups might use Flutter to quickly prototype their app or build an MVP due to the speed of development and cross-platform support.

How it Works: Rapid development with hot reload allows for quick iterations, with the ability to deploy to multiple platforms without significant code changes.

Flutter's approach of using one codebase for multiple platforms reduces development time and cost, makes maintenance easier, and allows for a uniform user experience across devices. However, developers must still consider platform-specific behaviors and user expectations to ensure the app feels native on each platform.
Comparing iOS and Android for mobile app development involves analyzing various technical aspects, including platform architecture, development tools, user demographics, and future technologies like AI. Here's a detailed comparison:

Platform Architecture:
iOS:
Operating System: Built on Darwin, which is based on Unix.
Language: Primarily developed using Swift or Objective-C.
Hardware: Controlled by Apple, ensuring uniformity across devices which simplifies development but limits hardware diversity.

Android:
Operating System: Based on a modified version of the Linux kernel.
Language: Mainly Java or Kotlin, with support for C++ for performance-critical sections.
Hardware: Open-source nature leads to a vast range of devices with varying hardware capabilities, requiring more effort for compatibility.

Development Tools and Environment:
iOS:
Xcode: Apple's integrated development environment (IDE) for iOS development, which includes all necessary tools for design, coding, and testing.
Simulator: Offers a robust iOS simulator for testing without needing physical devices.
App Store: Stringent review process ensures quality but can be a barrier to entry.

Android:
Android Studio: Google's official IDE, powered by IntelliJ IDEA, offering features like code completion, debugging, and a visual layout editor.
Emulator: Android's emulator allows for testing on various device configurations, though it can be resource-intensive.
Google Play: More permissive than the App Store, easier for app deployment but potentially less curated.

Pros and Cons for Developers:
iOS Pros:
Consistent User Experience: Due to uniform hardware and OS versions.
Higher Revenue Potential: iOS users tend to spend more on apps.
Easier Testing: With fewer device variations, testing is less complex.

iOS Cons:
Limited Market Share: Globally, Android has a larger user base.
Apple's Ecosystem: Developers must use Mac hardware to develop iOS apps, potentially increasing setup costs.
Long App Review Times: The approval process for the App Store can be lengthy.

Android Pros:
Larger Market Share: Reaches a broader audience worldwide.
Flexibility: Development can be done on any OS with the right tools.
Open Ecosystem: Easier to distribute apps through various channels.

Android Cons:
Fragmentation: Dealing with different screen sizes, OS versions, and hardware can complicate development.
Performance Variability: App performance can vary significantly across devices.
Security Concerns: More open nature can lead to app security issues.

Uses and Application Types:
iOS:
Enterprise Applications: Often preferred for business apps due to the perceived security and control.
Gaming: High-quality graphics and consistent hardware make it a popular choice for high-end games.
Premium Services: Apps that leverage Apple's ecosystem like HealthKit, Siri, etc.

Android:
Global Reach: Apps targeting markets where Android dominates, like emerging economies.
Customization: Apps that benefit from or require device diversity, like accessibility apps.
Cost-Effective Solutions: For developers looking to minimize initial hardware investment.

AI Potential:
iOS:
Core ML: Apple's machine learning framework for on-device AI, ensuring privacy with local processing.
Siri Shortcuts: Integrates apps with Siri for voice control and automation, enhancing user interaction.
Vision Framework: For image and video analysis, making it easier to develop apps with AI-driven visual features.

Android:
TensorFlow Lite: Google's lightweight solution for on-device machine learning, allowing for complex AI operations on various devices.
ML Kit: Provides easy-to-use APIs for common ML capabilities like text recognition, face detection, etc.
Google Assistant Integration: Offers deep integration for voice commands and smart home control.

AI Comparison:
Privacy vs. Capabilities: iOS emphasizes privacy with more on-device processing, while Android's ecosystem allows for more cloud-based AI, potentially offering more powerful capabilities but with privacy trade-offs.
Customization: Android's open nature might allow for more experimental AI applications or third-party AI service integrations.
Market Penetration: AI features might reach a broader audience on Android due to its larger market share, but iOS could provide a more consistent AI experience across devices.

Conclusion:
Choosing between iOS and Android for app development often comes down to target audience, business model, and resource availability. iOS might be preferable for developers targeting affluent markets or those looking for a more controlled development environment. Android is advantageous for reaching a global audience at potentially lower development costs but requires more effort to ensure app compatibility and performance across devices. The integration of AI in both ecosystems is robust, with different philosophies on privacy, processing, and integration methods. Ultimately, many developers choose to develop for both platforms to maximize reach and revenue, often leveraging cross-platform frameworks like Flutter or React Native to mitigate some of the development challenges.
Web designers often have varied opinions on the best frontend framework for mobile web development, influenced by factors like project requirements, team expertise, and personal preference. However, based on current trends, community feedback, and performance benchmarks, here are some frameworks that are frequently rated highly for mobile web development:

1. React.js
Pros:
Component-Based: React's component architecture is excellent for creating reusable UI elements, which can be particularly beneficial for mobile where screen real estate is at a premium.
Ecosystem: Vast ecosystem with libraries like React Native for native mobile app development, which shares much of the same syntax and logic with React for web, facilitating a smoother transition between mobile web and native apps.
Performance: Virtual DOM for efficient updates, which can lead to smoother experiences on mobile devices where performance is critical.
Community and Support: Extensive community support and resources, including numerous mobile-specific libraries and tools.
Cons:
Learning Curve: While React itself might not be too complex, managing state across a large application can become challenging.
SEO: React apps need additional setup for server-side rendering to optimize for SEO, which is crucial for mobile where organic search is significant.

2. Vue.js
Pros:
Ease of Use: Vue is known for its simplicity and ease of integration into existing projects, which can be advantageous for rapid mobile web development.
Performance: Vue provides high performance, which is key for mobile with potentially slower connections or less powerful hardware.
Progressive Framework: Can be adopted incrementally, making it suitable for projects where mobile might be an additional target rather than the primary one.
Cons:
Smaller Ecosystem: Compared to React, Vue has a smaller but still significant ecosystem, which might mean fewer plugins or tools specifically designed for mobile.

3. Angular
Pros:
Full-Featured: Angular includes everything out of the box, including routing, forms, and HTTP client, which can be beneficial for complex mobile web applications.
TypeScript: Using TypeScript can lead to fewer runtime errors, which is crucial when dealing with potentially diverse mobile environments.
Cons:
Bundle Size: Angular applications can have larger bundle sizes, which might impact performance on mobile devices with slower data connections or limited storage.
Complexity: Angular's complexity can be a barrier for smaller projects or teams without extensive Angular experience.

4. Svelte
Pros:
Compile-Time Magic: Svelte compiles to highly optimized vanilla JavaScript, leading to smaller bundle sizes and faster performance, ideal for mobile.
Reactivity: Built-in reactivity without the need for a virtual DOM can make for very performant applications.
Cons:
Newer Framework: Less widespread adoption means potentially fewer resources, plugins, and community support for mobile-specific features.

5. Framework7
Pros:
Mobile-First: Specifically designed for building hybrid mobile apps and mobile-first web applications with a focus on iOS and Material design.
Easy Integration: Can be used with vanilla JavaScript, Vue, or React, providing flexibility in how you approach mobile development.
Cons:
Niche Focus: While excellent for mobile, its focus might limit its use in broader web applications.

Community Sentiment:
React often gets the nod for its ecosystem, performance optimizations, and the seamless transition to React Native for full mobile app development.
Vue is praised for its simplicity and performance, making it a favorite for developers who want to prioritize user experience on mobile devices without the overhead of a more complex framework.
Svelte is gaining traction for its innovative approach, which could be particularly beneficial for mobile where performance and bundle size are key.

Conclusion:
React.js tends to be rated highly by many web designers for mobile web development due to its robust performance, large community, and the ability to leverage React Native for cross-platform mobile app development. However, the choice can vary based on specific project needs, team skills, and whether the project also requires desktop compatibility. Tools like Framework7 are also recommended for projects explicitly targeting mobile devices with less emphasis on desktop.

Remember, the "best" framework can depend on your specific needs, team expertise, and the project's scale, so evaluating each based on your criteria is essential.

ADVERTISEMENT

Managed VPS Hosting

$22.95/mo

Contact

Got questions? can help!

needs from you:
Clear instructions Any relevant files or media Your budget

Price $
We'll email you when responds.

Find people to hire.

Job done or your money back.

is available for hire!

When you log in you'll be able to connect with to discuss your project.

Log in